Hurt by a rideshare driver? We have recovered millions for our clients.
- Don't Pay Any Fees Unless You Win!
- Over 12+ Years Of Experience
- Millions Recovered For Clients
- Serving All Of California
Free Consultation – No Recovery, No Fee!
$1,625,000
Trip & Fall
$1,610,000
Car Accident
$1,250,000
Bus Accident
$1,000,000
Trip & Fall
California Rideshare Accident Lawyer
Uber, Lyft, and Other Rideshare Crash Claims Across California
Rideshare crashes are not regular car accidents. The coverage that applies depends on what the driver was doing the moment the collision happened (whether the app was off, on but waiting, or actively dispatched), and the difference between those phases can mean the difference between a $30,000 policy and a $1,000,000 policy. California law has built a specific insurance framework for Uber, Lyft, and other Transportation Network Companies (TNCs), and getting full recovery means understanding it. Novik Law Group represents passengers, other drivers, pedestrians, cyclists, and rideshare drivers themselves in accident claims across California. Call (818) 305-6041 for a free case review with attorney Erick Novik.
How Novik Law Group Can Help You
- Cash Advance On Your Case
- No Upfront Fees Or Retainers
- We Come To You If You Can't Travel
- Recover Your Lost Wages
- Repair Or Replace Your Car
- Get Help With Transportation
or Call (818) 305-6041 now!
Real People. Real Results.
We fight to get the best possible result for you.
$1,625,000
$1,610,000
$1,250,000
$1,225,000
How California's Rideshare Insurance Periods Work
California Public Utilities Code section 5433 divides rideshare driving into four phases and requires different levels of insurance during each. Which “period” the driver was in at the moment of the crash controls which policy pays, how much is available, and which carrier you negotiate against.
- Period 0: app off. The driver is not logged into Uber or Lyft and is driving for personal reasons. Only the driver’s personal auto policy applies, subject to California’s standard liability minimums. The rideshare company is not on the hook at all.
- Period 1: app on, no ride accepted yet. The driver is logged in and available but has not been matched with a passenger. California requires the TNC (or the driver, through a rideshare endorsement) to maintain at least $50,000 per person and $100,000 per incident for bodily injury, plus $30,000 for property damage. The TNC must also maintain $200,000 in excess liability coverage per occurrence.
- Period 2: ride accepted, driver en route to passenger. Once the driver accepts a trip and is heading to the pickup, the TNC must provide $1,000,000 in primary commercial liability coverage. This is a roughly twenty-fold increase from Period 1.
- Period 3: passenger in the vehicle. From the moment the passenger gets in until they exit, the TNC must maintain the $1,000,000 primary liability policy plus $1,000,000 in uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage protecting the driver and passengers.
This is why proving the app status at the time of the crash is one of the first things we do on a rideshare case. Uber and Lyft both retain digital records of when drivers logged in, when rides were accepted, when passengers were picked up, and when trips ended. Those records can be preserved through a litigation hold letter and produced in discovery. Without that evidence, the rideshare company will often default to claiming the driver was in Period 0 or Period 1, where less money is available.
Client Testimonials
Explore Our Practice Areas
100% FREE CONSULTATION
If you’ve been injured or lost a loved one due to another’s negligence, our team of experienced personal injury lawyers will fight to ensure you receive the compensation you deserve.
No cost consultation.
Please call us today and let us help you.
You don’t pay unless we win.
NOVIK LAW GROUP
A Professional Corporation
16830 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 401, Encino, CA 91436
Phone: (818) 305-6041
NOVIK LAW GROUP
A Professional Corporation
500 S. Sepulveda Blvd., Suite 523, Los Angeles, CA 90049
Phone: (213) 992-9233
NOVIK LAW GROUP
A Professional Corporation
7700 Irvine Center Dr., Suite 800, Irvine, CA 92618
Phone: (949) 800-5922
Who Can File a California Rideshare Accident Claim
We handle rideshare injury claims for everyone affected by the crash, not just one type of victim. Each role has a slightly different path to recovery.
- Passengers in the Uber or Lyft. If you were riding when your driver crashed (whether because of their own fault, another driver’s fault, or both), you almost always have access to the TNC’s $1,000,000 Period 3 policy. If the at-fault driver was someone other than your rideshare driver and they were uninsured or underinsured, the $1,000,000 UM/UIM coverage kicks in. Passenger claims are the most coverage-rich rideshare scenarios, and Uber and Lyft know it.
- Other drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists hit by an Uber or Lyft. If a rideshare driver hit you while in Periods 2 or 3, the $1,000,000 commercial policy is available. In Period 1, the $50,000/$100,000/$30,000 minimums plus the $200,000 excess apply. The challenge is documenting the app status at the time, which we do through subpoena of the TNC’s trip records.
- Rideshare drivers hurt in their own vehicles. When you are driving for Uber or Lyft and another driver causes a crash, you can pursue the at-fault driver’s policy and, if their coverage is inadequate, the TNC’s $1,000,000 UM/UIM coverage during Periods 2 and 3. Workers’ compensation issues are more complicated because of Proposition 22 and the independent contractor classification, but Proposition 22 does provide certain occupational accident benefits worth examining in every case.
- Surviving family members in fatal rideshare crashes. California’s wrongful death statute allows spouses, children, and certain other family members to recover for the loss of a loved one killed in a rideshare crash. The same Period framework controls which policies are available.
The Independent Contractor Defense Uber and Lyft Use
Uber and Lyft both classify their drivers as independent contractors rather than employees, and California voters cemented that classification for rideshare and delivery drivers when they passed Proposition 22 in 2020. The practical effect for an injury case is that the TNCs argue they are not directly liable for the negligent driving of “their” drivers under traditional respondeat superior (employer liability) principles.
That argument is more limited than the TNCs would like you to believe. Your claim for bodily injury still runs through the mandated commercial insurance the TNC is required by statute to carry. The TNCs do not get to use the independent contractor label to avoid the insurance framework the California Legislature put in place. Where the contractor question really matters is in attempts to reach beyond the policy limits through theories like negligent hiring, negligent retention, or failure to enforce safety policies. Those theories require careful pleading and case-specific facts (prior complaints about the driver, prior incidents, background-check failures), and we evaluate them in every serious-injury case.
The takeaway: do not let an Uber or Lyft adjuster talk you out of pursuing a claim by waving the “independent contractor” flag. The coverage exists by statute regardless.
Common Causes of California Rideshare Crashes
Rideshare drivers face a unique set of pressures, and certain crash patterns repeat across the cases we handle.
- App distraction. Drivers are constantly checking pickup locations, navigation prompts, surge maps, and ride acceptance windows. California’s hands-free law applies in full to rideshare drivers, and app interaction while driving is a strong negligence argument.
- Fatigue and shift-stacking. Many rideshare drivers work long hours or stack rideshare with another job. Fatigued driving is a recurring factor, particularly in late-night and early-morning crashes.
- Lower BAC threshold for rideshare drivers. Under California Vehicle Code section 23152(e), it is illegal for a rideshare driver to operate with a blood alcohol level of 0.04% or higher, half the limit for ordinary drivers. A rideshare driver who would not technically be considered “drunk” behind their personal vehicle is breaking the law if they pick up passengers at the same BAC.
- Unfamiliarity with the route. Drivers regularly enter neighborhoods, freeway interchanges, and pickup zones they do not know well, and last-second navigation decisions cause real crashes.
- Pressure to accept rides quickly. The platforms penalize drivers who decline trips or cancel after accepting. That pressure feeds aggressive driving and rolling stops, particularly in dense urban pickup areas.
For rideshare-specific issues that overlap with Uber or Lyft directly, see our Uber accident and Lyft accident pages.
Frequently Asked Questions About California Rideshare Accident Claims
The questions below address issues specific to rideshare claims. For broader car accident topics, including how California fault rules work and what to expect from the claim process, see the FAQ section on our homepage.
What are the rideshare "periods" in California and why do they matter?
California Public Utilities Code section 5433 splits rideshare driving into Period 0 (app off), Period 1 (app on, no ride accepted), Period 2 (ride accepted, driving to pickup), and Period 3 (passenger in the vehicle). Each period has a different mandatory insurance policy attached to it. Period 1 carries $50,000/$100,000/$30,000 minimums plus $200,000 excess. Periods 2 and 3 each carry $1,000,000 in primary commercial liability, and Period 3 adds $1,000,000 in uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage. The period in effect at the moment of the crash often determines whether a serious injury is fully covered.
I was a passenger in an Uber or Lyft that crashed. Who pays for my injuries?
If you were in the vehicle as a passenger, you were in Period 3, and the TNC’s $1,000,000 commercial liability policy is available regardless of whether your rideshare driver or another driver was at fault. If your rideshare driver was hit by an uninsured or underinsured at-fault driver, you also have access to the $1,000,000 UM/UIM coverage. Passenger cases are the strongest coverage scenario in rideshare law, but adjusters routinely make low initial offers because they know most passengers do not understand the policy limits.
I was hit by an Uber or Lyft driver who was on the app. Who pays?
If the rideshare driver had an accepted ride or a passenger in the vehicle (Periods 2 or 3), the TNC’s $1,000,000 commercial policy responds. If they were logged in but had not yet accepted a trip (Period 1), the $50,000/$100,000/$30,000 minimums and the $200,000 excess apply. If the driver was logged out (Period 0), only their personal policy is available, which is often inadequate for serious injuries. We confirm the period by subpoenaing the TNC’s trip and login records early in every case.
What if the rideshare driver was uninsured or the TNC tries to deny coverage?
For passengers and rideshare drivers, the $1,000,000 UM/UIM coverage during Period 3 is designed for exactly this scenario, including hit-and-run crashes. For other drivers and pedestrians hit by a rideshare vehicle, your own UM/UIM coverage on your personal auto policy may apply if the TNC’s coverage is denied or contested. Disputes between insurers are common in rideshare cases. Having a lawyer who understands the layered policy structure prevents you from being shuffled between carriers while bills pile up.
How long do I have to file a rideshare accident claim in California?
The general statute of limitations for personal injury in California is two years from the date of the crash. Wrongful death claims also follow the two-year rule. Claims against a government entity (for example, if a dangerous roadway contributed to the crash) typically require a written government claim within six months. The two-year clock can be tolled for minors. Insurance notice and preservation deadlines often run earlier than the statute itself, so do not wait.
Does Uber or Lyft try to settle before I hire a lawyer?
Yes, and the offers are almost always low. The TNCs and their insurers know that unrepresented claimants accept smaller settlements and sign releases that close the case permanently. Once a release is signed, it is extremely difficult to reopen the claim, even when serious complications develop later. Talk to a lawyer before you sign anything, and let us deal with the adjuster.
I was driving for Uber or Lyft when I got hurt. What are my options?
Even though Proposition 22 classifies you as an independent contractor, you still have multiple avenues. If another driver caused the crash, you can pursue their policy plus the TNC’s $1,000,000 UM/UIM coverage if you were in Period 2 or 3. Proposition 22 also requires the TNCs to provide certain occupational accident benefits, including medical expense and disability coverage, while you are logged in. The interplay between the at-fault driver’s policy, the TNC’s policies, and Proposition 22 benefits is complicated, and getting it wrong costs real money. We coordinate all of it in-house.
What about Uber Eats, DoorDash, and other delivery drivers?
The California TNC insurance framework was written for passenger-carrying rideshare, but Proposition 22 extended similar coverage and benefit structures to app-based delivery drivers in many circumstances. Crashes involving delivery drivers are handled case by case, with attention to which platform the driver was using, whether they were actively on a delivery at the time of the crash, and what coverage the platform requires of its drivers. Call us with the details and we will identify every source of coverage.
If you have been hurt in an Uber, Lyft, or other rideshare crash anywhere in California (whether you were a passenger, another driver, a pedestrian, a cyclist, or the rideshare driver yourself) Novik Law Group is ready to help. We work on contingency, the consultation is free, and we do not get paid unless we recover. Call (818) 305-6041 or reach our offices in Encino, West Los Angeles, or Irvine.
