Injured in an accident? We have recovered millions for our clients.
Free Consultation – No Recovery, No Fee!
$1,625,000
Trip & Fall
$1,610,000
Car Accident
$1,250,000
Bus Accident
$1,000,000
Trip & Fall
The 405 and 101 freeways meet in one of the country’s most complex interchanges right at Van Nuys’s southern edge. Van Nuys Boulevard runs a dense commercial strip up the center of the city. The Sepulveda industrial corridor houses one of the heaviest concentrations of construction, manufacturing, machine shops, and warehousing in the San Fernando Valley. Older multi-family housing stock blankets most of the surrounding blocks. The injury cases that come out of Van Nuys reflect this mix: serious freeway and intersection crashes, brain injuries from those crashes and from construction sites, premises and security cases in apartments and commercial buildings, hit-and-run incidents, and rideshare collisions. Novik Law Group is a Van Nuys personal injury law firm representing accident and injury victims across all of these categories. No fee unless we recover. Call (818) 305-6041 for a free case review.
How Novik Law Group Can Help You
or Call (818) 305-6041 now!
Real People. Real Results.
We fight to get the best possible result for you.
$1,625,000
$1,610,000
$1,250,000
$1,225,000
Car accidents are the largest case type we handle for Van Nuys clients, and the local geography produces a recurring set of crash patterns. The 405 and 101 freeways and their interchange at the south end of the city carry punishing daily traffic. Van Nuys Boulevard, Sepulveda, Roscoe, Sherman Way, Vanowen, and Victory carry heavy commercial and commuter volume across the street grid. See our California auto accident page for how these claims are built.
The 405/101 interchange is one of the most complex stretches of freeway in the country, with multiple stacked levels of transition ramps, high merge angles, and chronic peak-hour congestion. The recurring crash patterns include high-speed rear-end collisions in slowing traffic on the approach ramps, lane-change wrecks on the multi-lane transitions, and motorcycle and truck cases at the merge points. Freeway crashes are CHP-reported, and Caltrans is potentially involved where road condition, signage, or design contributed.
Van Nuys Boulevard is the city’s main commercial strip and a high-volume crash corridor end to end. Sepulveda Boulevard carries through-traffic the full north-south length of the city and concentrates left-turn and rear-end cases. Roscoe Boulevard, Sherman Way, Vanowen, Victory, and Magnolia carry steady volume across the grid, with intersection collisions and pedestrian strikes as the dominant case types.
Hit-and-run incidents are a meaningful share of the Van Nuys auto practice, particularly along Van Nuys Boulevard at night and in apartment-building parking lots and garages. When the driver who hit you fled the scene, your own uninsured motorist (UM) coverage is typically the primary recovery source. California requires insurers to offer UM, although drivers can decline it in writing. UM applies the same way it would if you knew the at-fault driver had no insurance. The LAPD Van Nuys Division crash report, any business or apartment surveillance footage, and witness identification are critical evidence priorities early in the case.
Van Nuys has heavy rideshare activity along Van Nuys Boulevard, around restaurants and nightlife, and across the residential network. Coverage in a rideshare case depends on the driver’s app status at the moment of the crash. App off: the driver’s personal policy applies. App on but no ride accepted: a limited contingent policy applies. Ride accepted or passenger in the car: a $1 million commercial policy from Uber or Lyft is typically in effect. We document the app status carefully early because the rideshare companies routinely take the position that more limited coverage applies. See our rideshare accident page.
Client Testimonials
100% FREE CONSULTATION
If you’ve been injured or lost a loved one due to another’s negligence, our team of experienced personal injury lawyers will fight to ensure you receive the compensation you deserve.
No cost consultation.
Please call us today and let us help you.
You don’t pay unless we win.
NOVIK LAW GROUP
A Professional Corporation
16830 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 401, Encino, CA 91436
Phone: (818) 305-6041
NOVIK LAW GROUP
A Professional Corporation
500 S. Sepulveda Blvd., Suite 523, Los Angeles, CA 90049
Phone: (213) 992-9233
NOVIK LAW GROUP
A Professional Corporation
7700 Irvine Center Dr., Suite 800, Irvine, CA 92618
Phone: (949) 800-5922
Brain injury is one of the most common serious-injury case types we see in Van Nuys, driven by the severity of crashes on the 405 and 101 and the falls and impacts that come out of the city’s construction and apartment building stock. The legal mechanics and the medical mechanics both require attention from day one. The carrier’s standard position is that “mild” brain injuries are not real and resolve on their own. The medicine, and the long-term outcomes, frequently say otherwise.
A “mild” TBI (often labeled a concussion) is a serious injury that can produce cognitive, mood, sleep, vestibular, vision, and headache symptoms lasting months or years. Mild TBIs are routinely under-diagnosed at the emergency room because imaging frequently looks normal and the patient is alert at discharge. The symptoms show up later, often weeks after the incident, and the injured person dismisses them as stress or fatigue. We get clients into neurological evaluation early, document the symptoms consistently, and avoid the gaps that the carrier uses to argue the injury was not real.
Moderate and severe brain injuries from high-speed Van Nuys freeway crashes, falls from construction-site heights, and serious assaults require a different case build. Neuropsychological testing, life-care planning, vocational rehabilitation analysis, and expert witnesses on the long-term implications of the injury are routinely necessary. These cases regularly settle in the seven and eight figures when properly developed, and routinely undersettle by orders of magnitude when they are not.
The carrier’s playbook on brain injury claims is consistent. They argue the injury was preexisting (any prior headache, any prior anxiety, any prior episode of dizziness becomes the supposed source). They argue the symptoms are exaggerated (defense neuropsychological exams are common). They argue treatment gaps prove the injury healed (any month without a doctor visit becomes their evidence). Each of these arguments is beatable, but only if the medical record was built right from the start. See our brain injury page.
Van Nuys hosts one of the heaviest concentrations of construction sites, machine shops, manufacturing operations, warehouses, and automotive industry facilities in the San Fernando Valley. The Sepulveda industrial corridor, the Van Nuys Airport service operations, and the surrounding commercial zones produce a steady flow of workplace injury cases that often involve two parallel legal tracks running on different rules.
Construction site cases in Van Nuys typically involve falls from heights, scaffolding and ladder failures, falling tools and materials, electrical injuries, crane and equipment collisions, and trench and excavation incidents. Liability often extends beyond the direct employer to general contractors, subcontractors, equipment manufacturers, property owners, and engineers depending on what failed. California Labor Code section 3706 lets an injured worker bypass workers’ comp and sue the employer directly when the employer failed to carry workers’ comp insurance, which is a real issue on smaller Van Nuys job sites.
The Sepulveda corridor’s manufacturing and machine shop operations, and the warehouses and distribution facilities across the Van Nuys industrial zone, generate cases involving press and machine injuries, forklift incidents, chemical exposures, lifting injuries, and falls in industrial settings. Equipment manufacturer liability, contractor liability, and premises liability against the building owner are the typical third-party angles.
The workers’ comp claim pays first and faster but does not include pain and suffering. The third-party civil case takes longer to develop but typically recovers significantly more. The workers’ comp carrier holds a statutory lien on any third-party recovery for what it paid out, and the lien can be negotiated down at the end of the case. Coordinating both tracks from the first conversation matters. Statements given in one can be used against you in the other.
Van Nuys’s high density of multi-family apartment buildings, older commercial building stock, and urban-grade retail produces a heavier premises liability practice than most cities in the Valley. The cases break into three categories with different legal mechanics.
The slip and trip cases come out of grocery stores and retail centers along Van Nuys Boulevard and Sepulveda, restaurants across the city, parking lots and parking structures, gas station forecourts, and entryways during rain. The case usually turns on whether the hazard existed long enough that the property should have discovered and fixed it. Surveillance footage and incident reports have short retention windows at most of these venues, so moving fast on evidence preservation matters. See our California slip-and-fall page.
Van Nuys’s multi-family housing density means landlord cases are a meaningful share of our premises practice. Common case patterns include unsafe stairs and broken handrails, pool and spa hazards, mold and water damage causing injury, broken or unmarked elevation changes, electrical hazards, and unrepaired hazards in common areas. The landlord’s duty under California Civil Code section 1714 and the implied warranty of habitability both feed into these cases. See our apartment premises liability page.
Negligent security cases involve an assault, robbery, or other criminal act on a property where the owner or operator failed to provide reasonable security. Van Nuys’s mix of late-night commercial venues, apartment complexes with shared common areas, and parking structures produces these cases regularly. The case turns on the foreseeability of the criminal act based on the property’s history and surrounding crime patterns, and the reasonableness of the security measures (or lack of them) in place. These cases often require security expert testimony and crime grid analysis.
The remaining vehicle-related case categories each represent a meaningful share of the Van Nuys serious-injury practice.
Lane-splitting cases in commute congestion on the 405 and 101, left-turn collisions on Van Nuys Boulevard and Sepulveda where a driver claims they “did not see” the rider, and freeway crashes at the 405/101 interchange are the dominant Van Nuys motorcycle patterns. See our California motorcycle accident page.
Pedestrian strikes cluster on Van Nuys Boulevard, Sepulveda, and Roscoe, with the Van Nuys Civic Center area and the commercial districts producing the heaviest case volume. Right-of-way is usually with the pedestrian in a marked crosswalk, although the driver’s insurer will press hard on any argument that the pedestrian darted out or was outside the crosswalk. See our pedestrian accident page.
Cyclist crashes in Van Nuys cluster on the bike-lane corridors along Van Nuys Boulevard and Sepulveda. Dooring cases, right-hook collisions at intersections, and crashes caused by drivers entering bike lanes dominate. See our bicycle accident page.
The 405 commercial truck traffic and the bus, shuttle, and delivery operations across the city produce serious-injury cases involving federal trucking regulations, electronic logging device data that disappears quickly, and corporate trucking and transportation defendants. When the bus operator is a public agency (LA Metro, LAUSD), the six-month government claim deadline takes over. See our truck collision page.
Wrongful death case volume in Van Nuys reflects the severity of the city’s worst crashes and the higher-risk job sites in the industrial sector. California wrongful death claims are brought by the surviving spouse, registered domestic partner, children, and certain other heirs. Damages include the loss of financial support the deceased would have provided, the loss of services, care, and companionship, funeral and burial expenses, and the family’s emotional losses. A separate survival action brought by the estate can recover damages the deceased could have recovered if they had survived the injury, including medical expenses and pre-death pain and suffering. The two-year statute of limitations applies, and the six-month government claim deadline applies if a public entity was involved. See our California wrongful death page.
Van Nuys is part of the City of Los Angeles, not a separate incorporated city. The civic and legal infrastructure has a few practical implications for injury cases that come up regularly.
If your case involves the City of Los Angeles (a city street, an LAPD vehicle, a city facility), Caltrans (the 405, the 101, or other state routes), LA Metro, the Los Angeles Unified School District, or any other government entity, you typically have six months from the date of injury to file an administrative claim before you can sue. Private injury claims run on the standard two-year California statute of limitations, but the moment a government entity is in the mix, the six-month clock controls. This is the deadline most injured people miss.
Crashes within Van Nuys are generally handled by the LAPD Van Nuys Division, with freeway crashes going to CHP. The Van Nuys Courthouse handles many of the civil cases venued in this part of the San Fernando Valley, and local familiarity with the assigned bench affects motion practice, settlement posture, and trial preparation.
The questions below come up regularly from injured people in Van Nuys. For broader personal injury topics, see the FAQ section on our homepage. To learn more about our team, see attorney Erick Novik‘s profile.
Yes, and the insurance company’s framing of “mild” is exactly why these cases need a lawyer. A mild traumatic brain injury (often labeled a concussion) is a serious injury that can produce cognitive, mood, sleep, vestibular, vision, and headache symptoms lasting months or years. The carrier’s standard playbook is to argue the injury was not real, the symptoms are exaggerated, the issues were preexisting, and any treatment gap proves the case is overblown. Each of these arguments is beatable, but only if the medical record was built right from the start. Get into neurological evaluation early, document the symptoms consistently, and do not let the carrier’s “mild” framing become your framing.
The 405/101 interchange has multiple stacked transition levels, high merge angles, and chronic peak-hour congestion, which produces some of the most serious multi-vehicle crashes in the Valley. Freeway crashes are CHP-reported, not LAPD, and any claim against Caltrans for road design, maintenance, or signage runs on the six-month government claim deadline. If a truck or commercial vehicle was involved, federal trucking regulations also apply, and the truck’s electronic logging device data auto-deletes on a short cycle. The interchange’s heavy traffic also means physical evidence and witness availability disappear quickly.
You likely have two parallel cases. The first is a workers’ compensation claim against your employer, which covers medical care and a portion of lost wages but does not include pain and suffering. The second is a potential third-party civil claim against a non-employer party (an equipment manufacturer whose machine caused the injury, a general contractor or subcontractor on a multi-employer site, a property owner separate from your employer, a chemical or product manufacturer, a delivery driver). The third-party case can recover the full range of damages that workers’ comp does not. If your employer failed to carry workers’ comp insurance, California Labor Code section 3706 lets you sue the employer directly. Both tracks need to start early and coordinate.
The property owner and the management company are the starting points, but the analysis often pulls in additional defendants. For a fall case, the question is whether the hazard existed long enough that the property should have discovered and fixed it. For a landlord premises case, the duty under California Civil Code section 1714 and the implied warranty of habitability both apply. For a negligent security case, the question is whether the criminal act was reasonably foreseeable given the property’s history and surrounding crime patterns, and whether the security measures in place were reasonable. Negligent security cases regularly involve security expert testimony and crime grid analysis. Document everything you can immediately, including photos of the hazard or the area where the incident happened, and get medical care before talking to building management or their insurance.
Your own uninsured motorist (UM) coverage is typically the primary recovery source in a hit-and-run. California requires insurers to offer UM, although drivers can decline it in writing. UM applies the same way it would if you knew the at-fault driver had no insurance. The insurance company will press hard for any evidence that another vehicle made contact, so the LAPD Van Nuys Division crash report, witness statements, paint transfer evidence, and any nearby business or apartment surveillance footage matter early. If the driver is eventually identified, we pursue them directly in addition to the UM claim.
It depends on the driver’s app status at the moment of the crash. App off, the driver’s personal insurance is on the hook. App on but no ride accepted, a limited contingent policy applies. Ride accepted or passenger in the car, a $1 million commercial policy from Uber or Lyft is typically in effect. We document the app status carefully early in the case because the rideshare companies routinely take the position that more limited coverage applies.
Usually, yes. The Van Nuys Courthouse handles many of the civil cases venued in this part of the San Fernando Valley, though larger or complex cases sometimes move to downtown Los Angeles depending on the parties and the amount at issue. Local familiarity with the assigned bench affects motion practice, settlement posture, and trial preparation.
Six months from the date of injury to file an administrative claim against the government entity before you can sue. The same deadline applies to claims involving LA Metro, the Los Angeles Unified School District, the LA Department of Transportation, and Caltrans for state freeways like the 405 and 101. Private injury claims still run on the standard two-year statute of limitations, but the moment a government entity is in the mix, the six-month clock controls.
If you were hurt in a Van Nuys crash, fall, construction accident, brain injury case, or any other situation involving someone else’s negligence, talk to a lawyer before the insurance company sets the terms. Brain injury symptoms get dismissed early. Construction site evidence disappears within hours. Hit-and-run leads go cold within days. Apartment surveillance gets overwritten on a short cycle. The six-month government claim deadline runs whether you know about it or not. Call (818) 305-6041 or contact us through the website. The case review is free and there is no fee unless we recover.